Milla - I noticed on your pre Diaries Video that at times you close your single column tie with a traditional reef or granny knot ( can't tell exactly which - eg single wrist of your arm binder ) and at a other times you use a variation of a bowline ( eg the ankle or wrists on your TK - perhaps called Fast Bowline or Portuguese ? - not Summerville not Burlington ). Can you explain why you choose your closures in general ( regarding knots in general ) and in specific ( which under various circumstances?) Thanks. Mark
top of page
To test this feature, visit your live site.
Edited: Oct 06, 2020
Closure knot preference Single Column Tie
Closure knot preference Single Column Tie
1 comment
Like
1 Comment
bottom of page
Hi Mark
Great observation, and great question. To be honest I do not know the formal names of each specific knot so it’s hard to answer your questions in that regards. The first knot which you referred to as possibly a granny or reef knot is a lot faster and easier to tie. However, it is also prone to collapse making it less secure. I try to limit using this knot with the exceptions of where the tie is temporary, as in I plan to release it shortly or a minor collapse would not cause any major issues. The knot which I use on the back of the TK for the wrists is a lot more secure and can be pulled in either direction without collapsing. It is also quick release which makes it ideal for situations where there is limited chance of an accidental pull (accidental release). I use a non-quick release variation of this knot (instead of creating a loop I pull it straight through) for ankle cuffs/suspension lines and other cuffs which are in a position that could be in danger of getting hooked or accidentally pulled. This is recommended for wrist/ankle cuffs which may be prone to collapse due to later added load or even just the person struggling in the moment. All in all, the later is ideal, albeit more fiddly to tie and get the tensions correct. I hope this answered your question. If not please feel free to say so, and I will try to be more specific. - Milla